Posted By RichC on May 26, 2006
This is going to be a challenging post … and short. I have opted to try a new smartphone — the Palm Treo 700p. (have used a Samsung i500 Palm based phone for the last several years) As I sit pecking on the tiny chicklet keys I realize this is not going to work. Tomorrow I’ll try to comment from a computer.
🙂
Posted By RichC on May 26, 2006
Robert Heron and Patrick Norton host a web based video podcast called DL.TV that reviews technology events twice a week. I occasionally … well regularly … watch or listen to their broadcast. They host a great 40 minute program at DL.TV and offer their reviews and thoughts on technology news of the week. In program #62 Robert mentioned his testing of a projection tv unit that he uses a can of compressed air to blow off some dust but the explanation is better coming from the source; check it out below.
😀
Posted By RichC on May 25, 2006
Mandating biofuels: It looks like the ‘politically correct’ thing to do … even though I also see it as a good thing to do. The Louisiana legislature looks to be proposing that their state use ethanol and biodiesel as production comes online. The House Bill 685 introduced by Rep. Francis Thompson would require that 2 percent of gasoline and diesel being sold in the state be of ethanol or biodiesel. Other states such as Minnesota already have laws mandating the use of domestic renewable fuels so this looks to be a trend.
(check out the article in the New Orleans online Times-Picayune)
Once production of ethanol or biodiesel within Louisiana reaches a certain level, House Bill 685 by Rep. Francis Thompson, D-Delhi, would require that 2 percent of all gasoline or diesel sold in Louisiana contain ethanol or biodiesel. While the proposal does not require retailers to sell the blended fuel to consumers, Agriculture Commissioner Bob Odom would be put in charge of a regulatory framework that would oversee sale of the products throughout the state.
Posted By RichC on May 25, 2006
General Motors will be testing a new marketing gimmick in the states of California and Florida in hopes to boost sales of a few of their models. They will be “capping fuel prices” as $1.99 for buyers of Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban sport utility vehicles and Impala and Monte Carlo sedans; the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL SUVs; the Hummer H2 and H3 SUVs; the Cadillac SRX SUV; and the Pontiac Grand Prix and Buick LaCrosse sedans. The catch is that you must subscribe to OnStar for $16.95/month, but still not a bad deal if you’re looking to buy a new GM vehicle. (read Dee-Ann Durbin Associated Press article here)
Posted By RichC on May 24, 2006
Even thought this isn’t a commericial, it is a video clip and has tickled my funnybone. For those who have sent emails to let me know that you enjoy the occasional light-hearted ‘short’ video clip, here’s a good one for you. The clip is a little suspicious and almost seems set up, yet its pretty good nevertheless.
Posted By RichC on May 23, 2006
We’re five day away from the 9oth running of the Indianapolis 500 and the clean fuel advocates will have an opportunity to see Ethanol introduced at the brickyard. This year’s race is on May 28th and will showcase IRL cars running a blend of 90% Methanol and 10% Ethanol. This ‘home grown’ fuel choice has been a long time in coming and has been promoted by many in the “grass roots” (pun intended) community including the late Paul Dana who died in a crash earlier this year. The most promising note for those supporting renewable fuels is that the 2007 season is slated to run entirely on 100% Ethanol. The PBS program Motorweek hosted by John Davis acknowledged Paul Dana’s contribution and the Indy Racing League showcasing Ethanol.
Posted By RichC on May 22, 2006
My buddy the automotive journalist that I best know as “Cranky Frank,” aka … Frank Giovinazzi, had a chance to review the Volkswagen GTI this past weekend; what a lucky scoundrel! I’d love to pick apart his review, but all I can do is just drool. Instead of reviewing the review … just click over to CarBuyersNotebook.com and read his 2006 VW GTI review. Well done Frank … even if it isn’t a diesel.
🙂
Posted By RichC on May 21, 2006
I suspect there is too much be written about Dan Brown’s book, The Da Vinci Code (published in 2003), and the ‘just released’ movie. Maybe though, there are many are like me who are just curious enough to want to discuss the book and movie from the social cultural perspective after having read the book and seen the movie? If you are tired of the overwhelming number of reviews, opinions, the ‘what you should think’ controversy and the dollars ‘we’ pour into fictional stories and Hollywood movies … then just pass on reading this post. For those wanting a little more, I’ll try to keep ‘my thoughts’ concise.
My wife and I both read the ‘work of fiction,’ The Da Vinci Code,’ by the best selling author Dan Brown a couple of years ago. We enjoyed the book and discussed it quite a bit when it was first published. We both found it an intriguing story that blended tidbits of factual history with a creative story of secrecy and cover up into an interesting plot. I’ve always enjoyed books of ‘factual fiction’ and have read most of the novels by Tom Clancy, Stephen Coonts, Clive Cussler among others. (guy books) In keeping with the ‘factual fiction’ writing style, Dan Brown uniquely merges fact and weakly or unsupported conclusions into the entertaining storyline of the Da Vinci Code. After having a couple good debates with family members and listening to a perspective or two from scholars and pastors, we decided to see the movie for ourselves.
I don’t intend to tell the story or grind the details since it is better done by professional book and movie reviewers or the many scholars of church history attempting to differentiate the ‘work of fiction’ account from ‘real history.’ What I will conclude is that both the book and movie are well done from the standpoint of entertainment. My fear is that there is a generation of young people learning history through movies without the ability to separate real events in history from the movie-maker’s perspective. This is particularly disturbing when the movies are “fictional accounts of true events.”
As movies based on books go, Ron Howard did an outstanding job of presenting the story told in Dan Brown’s novel — in the least offensive way as possible. What I’m referring to is the blasphemous way the novel deals with Christianity. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve no doubt heard about the offensive claims posed by Dan Brown against Biblical accounts. Brown’s single line preceding the novel claims “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.” Maybe that statement leaves wiggle room from the author’s perspective as to what is surmised and what is fact … but may Christ followers find the conclusion and position that the book is based on ‘fact’ offensive.
Howard (and perhaps Hanks) chose to soften the character of Robert Langdon and made him a bit more sensitive to Christian history. He modifies Brown’s more secular Langdon and gives the character a few lines that refute some of the conclusions the “Grail Seeker,” Lee Teabing, proposes. Facial expression from Tom Hanks from my perspective also offered addition doubt to Teabing’s blasphemous statements when talking to Sophie. In a small way Ron Howard ‘softens’ the film version of the novel in its portrayal of Christian history.
Brown used his two primary characters, the American Harvard professor Robert Langdon (played by Tom Hanks) and Sophie Neveu (played by Audrey Tautou) to unroll his story that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and bore a child AND that the Holy Grail was not a chalice as history knows it, but the offspring of Christ … the “royal bloodline.” The novel weaves in symbols and history in a 2000 year cover up of this through secret societies that continue to this day. As a ‘fictional story’ it is intriguing, as a Christian it is also blasphemous, especially if it is being sold as “accurate” from the standpoint of history. Imagine any other religion, nationality or race being written about in this way? If their history was questioned, comments critical to the core divinity of their belief written and filmed or events questioned as true or accurate … what would the press and public say? I surmise that if this were an anti-Jewish, Islam, African American or critical of homosexuals that the book and movie would be talked about and covered differently. I know from an incident just a few months ago what would happen in the religion of Islam. In other words, there is a reason why this ‘fictional story’ is a sensitive issue to most devoted Christians and why some are angry about its popularity and positive treatment. One off our pastors (Dan Dunlop) made the comment when he watched the movie with one of his Catholic neighbors that he felt as “if his best friend was being assaulted.” There is an interesting unity happening between different ‘faiths’ of Christianity.
As a Christian, I’m forcing myself to look at this movie from a positive perspective … what God would want me to do with all the attention being placed on Christ? Just as Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” stimulated many to delve in The Word, I believe “The Da Vinci Code” will do the same. It will no doubt shake the faith of many struggling Christians, but will strengthen those seeking the true and open opportunities of evangelism where doors have been close. Perhaps the book and the movie will make stronger Christians of those of us wanting to share the Good News Jesus offers?
Posted By RichC on May 20, 2006
I don’t own a DirecTV system, nor am I a shareholder … but I do appreciate their new advertising campaign. I posted a comment about a DirecTV commericial (Ferris Bueller) a couple of days ago, but just spotted another pretty funny one tonight while watching a news program. Maybe its not quite as good as the first, but it caught my attention too … but then that’s the hook in a good commercial, right?
Posted By RichC on May 19, 2006
The Nasdaq tracking index CLEN debuted on May 18th and is a tracking index similar to the QQQ only for Clean Energy companies. It contains companies who are producing renewable fuels, advanced storage devices, energy efficiency and advanced materials. The second step will be to build trading vehicles around this clean energy index. John Jacobs, Nasdaq Global Fund CEO, was interviews on Friday morning on CNBC and explained the selection of the 45 companies (35 from the Nasdaq/10 from the NYSE) currently being tracked in the index and the likelyhood that there will be an ETF (Exchanged Traded Fund) based on this index much like the QQQ.
As a pure play index, any kind of investment vehicle will most likely be a higher than average risk investment as the companies currently in the index are primarily small cap. The minimum 150 million market cap was set for companies to be considered for CLEN but it provides a trackable start for those of us seeing clean energy and related companies having future growth potential. Many ‘green’ oriented investors will jump at the chance to own a ETF based on this index as a way to diversify their holdings in clean-energy focused companies.
