SATS Technology – AirTransportation

Posted By on May 16, 2005

A Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) technology demonstration is scheduled for June 5 – 7, 2005 and will showcase some of the operating capabilities developed to make small aircraft and airports more accessible to more people. This is the information technology that is needed to open the door to personal air transportation along with the hardware like I mentioned in my previous post.

In email correspondence with Attila Melkuti he has indicated hopes of a first flight for his AMV-211 aircraft. “At this point I am conducting some initial taxi testing since I finished the landing gear configuration modification. My goal is to fly it before I take it to Chicago.”

I’m am excited in supporting his project and look forward to visiting with him in Chicago.

It is indeed exciting to be part of the aviation frontier (and preservation of its past) as we move forward these next couple of decades. With NASA SATS 2005 project in remapping the air traffic system to included personal aircraft … the “sky (pun intended) is indeed the limit.”

A great 12+ 60 minutes clip was sent to me by a friend, Mark Keener, and I’ve decided to include it for those wanting to see some of the possible future personal aircraft projects. (Recorded on April 17, 2005)

Right click and save will download this DIVX format (free codec) .AVI file: Future of Flight.avi (warning – 33megs)

Imagine … newspapers on a computer. No way!

Posted By on May 15, 2005

Service to Country

Posted By on May 13, 2005

I enjoy reading and posting in several forums that usually pertain to an area of mutual interest. Over time it is easy to make friends (and occasional nemeses … hmm is that a word?) that move off topic for discussion of divisive issues such as religion and politics. One such issue is on how we go about fighting ‘terrorism.’

A forum conversation in regard to military recruitment has prompted new ideas in regard to recruiting, just as an exposé from a high school journalist, David McSwaine (CBS new article)made the news. The article that spurred the forum discussion was published in USAToday brought forward a new ‘lite’ enlistment that has an initial ‘up’ of 15 months.

After quoting the comments of a senior member of the forum, I’ll included my thoughts not so much on the “lite” enlistment recruiting technique, but on his opinion that this is a “Moron Draft.” (I realize that often frustration is what stimulates strong statements … but it does open the door to an exchange of thoughts)

His comments about the article:
Really scraping the bottom of the barrel for the “volunteer” army. what kind of moron signs on for “1.25 years” when you still get stuck with an eight year commitment in the guard/reserve (the guard/reserve making up half the troopers in iraq and way more than half of the dead/mulitlated bodies, btw).

Look for some stupid and really unhappy troopers to start acting out (fragging the officers) in 1.25 years when the dim bulbs finally turn on as to what they’ve done to themselves.

“Son, with your sign-up bonus – there will be a shiny new mustang waiting for you in 1.25 years….”. “Does that come with handicaped driver modifications?” See forum discussion for addtional comments.

Not to disagree totally with your analysis (because I’m a dad of two at or nearing the age), but there is also a component of “despiration +stupidity +adventure +invunerablity +excitement +youthful exhuberance +less we forget, patriotism/service to country” that factor into the decision. The same risk/excitement/reward thinking that goes into motorcycle riding, rock climbing, hang gliding, etc often goes into those youthful minds joining the US military. By thinking less of those volunteering (ie. “Moron”) to serve is also a discredit to their patriotism.

Unfortunately, for many signing on, there will be a sense of regret and disillusionment. I dislike the ‘overselling’ style recruitment and disception that seems to ‘still’ exist behind the doors in some recruiting offices. I do believe that we have cleaned up much of the flat out ‘lie recruiting’ of the past, but also realize that selling an all expense paid trip to Iraq will probably not include marketing the down side with as much ‘spit and polish’ as the upside.

I’m not fond of your title “Moron Draft” … that is not being honorable to those volunteers choosing to risk their lives in service to our country. Military service is a high risk job. There have been generations of young soldiers who have valiantly come forward when our nation has asked for their service with far less honesty during recruitment. Most men and women walking into a recruiting office today know precisely what they are doing and I’m thankful for their service.

Let me share a story from a friend of mine; a two tour Vietnam Marine:
Tim was a high school graduate enrolled in college during the early 60s. (pre-heavy protest) He choose to enlist in the Marine corp (ie. serve with the best attitude) before being drafted as graduation from college loomed. He spent his first tour leading (literally) young men daily into the jungles and when he became a ‘short timer’ (nearing end of service) was offered increasingly attractive options to re-up. The final straw was as the 30 day mark came and he was ‘promised’ rear duty and an immediate R & R trip to Hawaii and no more trips into the jungle (v. 30 more days of it). Understand the ‘short-timer’ mindset as you watch soldiers dying everyday knowing you only need to make it 30 days and then having the ‘carrot’ of 30 days R&R in Hawaii dangled in front of your nose. Many young marines chose the trip and a second tour as did Tim.

Although stories in the US armed forces recruiting offices still exist, I’ve not heard them continue with this kind of tactic as a regular practice. For Tim … the duty was as promised, rear duty, but no where close to sane. With it came different dangers much like the ones that face our ‘peace’ keeping soldiers today … urban patrols.

AMV-211 VTOL Aircraft

Posted By on May 10, 2005

AMV Aircraft

Next month I’ll have a chance to personally check out the AMV Aircraft. (well not ‘be’ checked out. 🙂 ) Actually it has been seen as the personal aircraft of the future by some and just another prototype design by others. No matter … I like it.

AMV Aircraft Vertical Takeoff

What is unique is that this small two place personal VTOL aircraft offer the vertical takeoff and landing with the cruising speed of a fixed wing airplane. Designers have been working on this kind of plane for decades; we have yet to see many in current use.

AMV Aircraft Horizonal Cruise

The current AMV-211 Experimental Aircraft uses a Mazda turbocharged rotary engine to power its 5 bladed graphite/kevlar 94″ internal prop that powers the 1240 pounds empty weight plane. It has a cruise speed of 250 mph and a range of 1000 miles on 50 gallons of fuel. The 3000 ft/min designed climb rate could be exceptional for short fields or for the potential 40 foot by 40 foot runway. 🙂 Its two place design is only about 20 feet long by 20 feet wide. Will stabilty be a problem?

What makes this particular design unique is that it uses ducting rather than a ’tilting’ mechanism to change the airflow. By eliminating one of the main elements that have plagued previous VTOL aircraft, the AMV-211 can go from providing lift to providing forward thrust without swiveling the engine.

The VTOL aircraft designer, Attila Melkuti, has solved the problem by having the whole aircraft transisition or turn instead. He does this by using a propulsion system called a ducted fan. This is a propeller with five blades that is encircled by a band made of a light, composite material. That makes the aircraft both safer (because there are no stray propeller blades around) and quieter (because the sound is deadened by the encircling band).

Four Thumbnail AMV Aircraft

What is novel about Mr Melkuti’s design, is that the aircraft’s wings are placed at an angle to the fan. The wings and the fuselage itself also provides aerodynamic lift offering improved ‘airplane’ flight characteristics including power off emergency landings. The craft takes off with the fan perfectly horizontal, blowing straight down. As the craft then rotates, the wings start providing lift, and the fan starts blowing towards the back. To land, you simply reverse the process.

This aircraft is still in the preliminary stages of testing although has received the FAA airworthiness certificate. Most critics question the stability of the the VTOL design and although it has not been fully tested after some engine cooling redesign, Mr. Melkuti believes that stabilty will be easily controlled through the ducting. We shall see.

2005 Photo of AMV-211

Katelyn, “a future Astronaut” 😉 and I will be heading to Chicago in June to personally talk to the designer and learn about the company and design. (who knows where my daughter will “land” someday?) I’ll keep you posted and hopefully bring back some photos. Stay tuned.

Cheap Petroleum

Posted By on May 9, 2005

Most of us in the US ‘love’ cheap energy … unfortunately what we like isn’t always good for us.

I’ve enjoyed regular forum debates with Mike Briggs, from UNH, on many issues. A recent issue has me rethinking my positions on a ‘new tax.’ Yes … a TAX … shame on me. Mike presented his idea in a rational way that includes a reform that collect a ‘sin’ style tax on petroleum with a matching reduction on the income tax side.

Here’s why this proposal makes sense:

On the plus side … cheap energy while it is available (by boosting supply and protecting these asset with taxpayer funds – exploration, pumping, refining, importing, shipping and piping) creates a better environment for our economy to excel. We drive bigger and more powerful vehicles and ship products by the fasted means. A country the size of our ‘loves’ it. We smile and life seems good.

On the negative … cheap energy places us at the whims of OPEC and other oil producers … including our own ‘highly’ profitable companies. It deters development of alternatives and places us in more vulnerable situation when supplies are also wanted by other developing nations. (i.e.. China and India of late)

The cycle we are being caught in has happened to us twice that I can remember … once in the 70s and now. The rapid price swings have favored foreign manufactures who were already producing efficient vehicles in comparison to our domestic companies. We were caught flat footed back then … and it is happening again. I recall a quick move toward economical cars (Japanese) and alternative forms of energy were quickly considered for heat and electricity. Then as we started to get up to speed …. more oil began to feed the system and prices in comparison to inflation stagnated in oil … and actually pulled back. This through cold water on alternatives and efficiency gave way to more power and bigger cars. The lower oil prices shut down exploration, additional capital intensive refineries and enticed consumer to drive more, order next day shipping and give up on renewable energy options seeing them as offering a poor ROI.

Now here we are again … back on the alternatives and looking for better choices. Japan is first in line with their Prius and Honda Hybrids … VW and Mercedes is leading the pack with highly successful modern diesels and US based corporations are once again flat footed while those pumping the oil in the middle east are smiling all the way to their palaces.

Question is … will petroleum production come back on line after sinking our economy again? (how many times will it happen?) I can see it happening all over again … the petroleum will slowly come into the system controlled by foreign countries and the largest of the oil companies. The new found life toward efficiency and better alternatives to our dependence on oil will find it harder and harder to compete and once again the US addiction to petroleum will continue as interest in alternatives, efficiency and smarter energy dries up.

One option is to have congress evaluate how many tax dollars go toward securing the need for oil. Do we fund projects and protect oil assets around the world? Yes. Perhaps this cost be reflected in the price for oil? We can do this with a petroleum related tax (or call it something else if the word irritate you as much as it does me) and A REDUCTION of the same coming from our income taxes. Not all the far fetched … as anti-tax and free market kind of guy I am … it made perfect sense. I’m open for suggestions if you have a better way to continue to encourage something to break our addiction.

’75 MGB lives!

Posted By on May 9, 2005

Mother’s Day 2005 was a good day for both mom and son. Taylor, who is turning 16 this summer, had a great day as he had an opportunity to drive our 1975 MBG we have been working on this winter. Last month we were able to finish the mechanical work on the engine and without a hitch brought it back to life after a long sleep. (last start was 1992!)

Taylor with 1975 MGB Project

Actually we had a chance to drive it back and forth in the driveway a few weeks ago, but Sunday was the first real drive around the yard since replacing brakes, lines, rotors, etc. So far the new Weber carb and Peco large bore straight through exhaust is flawless. Its going to be a fun rag top! (is Taylor ready to drive or what!)

1975 MGB around yard

The Neocon Reader

Posted By on May 5, 2005

The current book that I’m finishing up is an ‘eye-opening’ look into the writings of prominent neoconservative thinkers. I am finding this political science collection of essays to be extrodinarily helpful in understanding American neoconservative political influence of the Bush administration.

As a more traditional conservative, much of the thought is quite radical. The revitalization of the principles of preemptive use of our military such as John Quincy Adam and Theodore Roosevelt followed to different ideas toward welfare and crime reduction. What has surprised me most are the thoughts from several authors and their most interesting way of how we will fund all of the proposed ideas.

The editor is Irwin Stelzer who is a senior fellow and director of the Hudson Institute’s economic policy program. He is perhaps best known as a political columnist forthe London

  • Sunday Times
  • ,

  • The Courier Mail
  • of Australia and the contributing editor of the

  • The Weekly Standard.
  • The book is published by Grove Press.

    Life’sense’ Advice

    Posted By on May 5, 2005

    I’ve often talked about sharing what I’ve learned through mistakes and success in a book. I’ve got a pile of notes that I’ve continued to add to over the years in this regard and thought I would segment them into a collection of thoughts or essays with the hopes of creating the book project I’ve always talked about.

    The subject is something everyone uses after leaving home, or perhaps even before that. The idea is to share the wise decisions in regard to commonsense … “life-sense” … advice from things like what tools to purchase when your are young to avoiding the pitfalls of living above your means. Wise living and commonsense can use a few pointers and those tossing these thoughts around will find their lives happier and more comfortable.

    My thinking is to combine practical ideas and decisionmaking with satisfaction and happiness at each stage of ones maturity. Occasionally my suggestions will refect ‘commonsense,’ but other times the ‘off the beaten path’ suggestions are a bit more radical. Anyway this is the place I will be exploring occasional thoughts for the project.

    Interested in Biodiesel?

    Posted By on May 4, 2005

    I’m always looking to build a better mousetrap … like replacing our petroleum diesel fuel with biodiesel.

    With oil prices over $50/barrel, biodiesel is in the news almost everyday. Obviously some big dollars from American soybean growers have boosted the farm lobbies and politicians are finding out that supporting renewable homegrow alternatives to foriegn oil ‘sells.’ That was quite evident in the November presidential campaign where President Bush mention it in many of his stump speechs.

    It has been amazingly difficult to make inroads with an alternative that makes so much sense, yet when you talk to the average American about replacing the primarily imported, dirty, stinky, carcinogenic fuels we are now using, they support clean renewables to the tune of 74 percent. Of registered voters, 79 percent favor extending the biodiesel tax incentives. The Chairman of the National Biodiesel Board, Darryl Brinkmann believes that “Americans clearly see the important role renewable fuels can play in reducing our dependence on foreign oil and cleaning up emissions.” Its impressive to see more than 500 major fleets nationwide now use biodiesel commercially, including NASA, Harvard University, the National Park Service, U.S. Postal Service and all four military branches. The U.S. Navy is the world’s largest diesel fuel user and it has recently issued a memorandum establishing as policy that “all U.S. Navy and Marine non-tactical diesel vehicles shall operate on a blend of 20 percent biodiesel fuel no later than June 1.”

    The rest of us are left to struggle a bit, as currently there are just over 400 retail filling stations that make various blends of biodiesel publicly available, but more than 1,000 petroleum distributors carry it. Perhaps it is the peoples turn, we biodiesel advocates need to convince retail stations to offer biodiesel and then convince diesel owners to support them?

    There are many advantages of adopting biodiesel, ethanol and blends to our current fuels. Both biofuels provide cleaner emissions, an economic boost to our US economy and biodiesel due to its lubricity has shown to extend engine maintenance cycles and reduced wear. (something ULSD will be challenged to match) The 1998 U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Agriculture full lifecycle emissions study, which found that for every unit of fossil energy needed to make biodiesel, 3.2 units of energy are gained. In contrast, petroleum-diesel production requires a net loss of 1.2 units of fossil fuels to produce 1 unit of energy.

    Beyond socio-economic, environmental and health benefits, biodiesel (and ethanol) eases U.S. withdrawal pains as the nation will eventually be forced to wean itself from diminishing, costly imported oil. The United States consumes approximately 20 million barrels of oil a day, more than half of which is imported. Even under the most aggressive, environmentally controversial development scenarios, the U.S. Department of Energy predicts that by 2025 we will import 70 percent of our petroleum. Despite ongoing turmoil throughout the Middle East, the U.S. remains dangerously dependent on foreign oil.

    Although it is contraversial, the Department of Energy estimates that the military cost of securing foreign oil was $57 billion annually and foreign tax credits accounted for another $4 billion annually. There is also environmental impact of extracting and transporting oil; these costs are estimated at $45 per barrel and for every billion dollars spent on foreign oil, America has lost 10,000 to 25,000 jobs.

    Biodiesel can be manufactured using existing industrial production capacity with conventional equipment, thus it provides an opportunity to immediately address U.S. energy security issues. Requiring 4 percent biofuels use would displace nearly 2.9 billion barrels of crude oil by 2016, rendering unnecessary, among other things, industrial development of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s unique, biologically rich coastal plain.

    BTW it was recently announced, for those of you who enjoy Indy car racing, the IRL- home of the Indianapolis 500 – it will power its racecars with ethanol beginning in the 2006 season. Keep the support and publicity going for biofuels.

    I just realized that this entry might not be in a useful form; I’ve pretty much jumped from one tidbit to another as I was recalling articles that I’ve recently read. Maybe that’s the way a blog should read???

    “What is” Odds and End

    Posted By on May 3, 2005

    I thought I would start the Misc section today and start with the ‘click’ of the day post. 🙂

    Today’s interesting link is a semi-reference site that usually provides more humor than information: “What is” lookup. It is interesting what pops up by plugging in different words.

    Example:
    Since I’ve been following the Ivory Billed Woodpecker story, I thought it would be interesting to see “What is the Ivory Billed Woodpecker.”

    • The ivory billed woodpecker is said to be the “Holy Grail” of bird watching.
    • The ivory billed woodpecker is a pretty bird.
    • The ivory billed woodpecker is not extinct.
    • The ivory billed woodpecker is extinct in the US.
    • The ivory billed woodpecker is a tale of how humans pushed a species to the brink of extinction and then tried valiantly to undo the.

    Found 5 ways to describe what The ivory billed woodpecker is.

    Desultory - des-uhl-tawr-ee, -tohr-ee

    1. lacking in consistency, constancy, or visible order, disconnected; fitful: desultory conversation.
    2. digressing from or unconnected with the main subject; random: a desultory remark.
    My Desultory Blog