Newer cars are too complicated. What have I gotten myself into?

Posted By on April 16, 2016

20160415_ECUBMWX535dWhat a mess of "tiny snakes" as my daughter call the the organized harnesses of wires connected to my cars ECU.

I have to admit, I was taken back at the perception of a rats nest of connectors and wiring all tying into the BMW X5 35D’s computer. The air and water tight box under the hood housed the cars brain … something that every modern car has and will need for years to come. Mechanically, the drivetrain hasn’t changed that much in my lifetime, but all functions of modern vehicles have definitely changed. I consider myself relatively computer literate compared to my parents or even others in my generation, but the sophistication under the hood is making me feel pretty old.

Hopefully I won’t mess things up too much as correcting it won’t be a simple matter. Wish me luck, because I’m going to need it.

Comparing chip temperatures on the Raspberry Pi2 and P3

Posted By on April 15, 2016

Pi2_vs_Pi3_tempsSince I’m running a couple of Raspberry Pi computers 24/7 and have both the Pi2 and Pi3 forwarding their processor temps a couple times each day with a Python Twitter script, it has been interesting to compare the two boards.  Obviously the Pi3 is in every way faster at computing and running stock at 1200Mhz, whereas  the Pi2 is running accelerated from stock at 900Mhz (anything faster causes stablity problems).

vcgencmd get_config arm_freq && vcgencmd measure_temp

It isn’t really a fair comparison because the two computers are in different locations with different ambient temperatures and different loads. I expected the Pi2 to run a little hotter since it encodes and streams video during daylight hours? The Pi3 on the other hand is a low traffic webserver and not required to do all that much since cache pages don’t require compiling?

Since the little $5 heatsink hasn’t arrived yet, I’ll keep watching the temps to see how close to 90 degrees C the Raspberry Pi 3 continue to rise under processing load (set to visually alert).

Anchoring a Boat: The Ultimate Guide — Fatty Goodlander

Posted By on April 14, 2016

Although Fatty Goodlander’s book "Creative Anchoring: Everything About Anchors and Anchoring" is a more in-depth guide to anchoring your small boat, a 2014 AllAtSea.net article by the same author is shorter and very good advice. I’ve read it before, but it is worth archiving on my personal blog just in case the link disappears.

Anchoring a Boat: The Ultimate Guide

86594aad-b214-47d6-896e-e791e76b63a8
Ganesh’s Rocna anchor fits like a glove

If you don’t know how to safely anchor your vessel for the conditions expected, you should not leave the dock. Anchoring is the bedrock skill of the cruising sailor.

Anchoring is, at its core, extremely simple. However, perfecting your technique and adapting your gear to the conditions experienced can take a lifetime. I’m on my 54th year of living aboard; the vast majority of that time has been spent sitting on my own hook.

During the course of 2+ circumnavigations and over 100,000 ocean miles sailed, I’ve experienced a wide variety of anchoring situations. I’ve never damaged my vessel—or another vessel—by dragging.

Here’s a brief primer on Anchoring a Boat, to get you started.

First off, let’s consider the anchor—especially the anchor which has pride-of-place on your bow roller.

You can’t effectively and safely anchor with a poorly made, poorly designed ‘no name’ anchor. I’m a frugal guy who watches his pennies—but your ground tackle is no place to economize. Quality costs.

Different anchors do different things well

Some are lightweight. Some are meant to stow in a hawse hole. Others are designed for rock.

Which anchor is best for general use?

Well, that’s the subject of vast controversy and much emotion. But I want to honestly and effectively help my readers to enjoy their boats, and the best way I can do that is just to be honest with my own opinion and experience.

For instance, I believe that, ounce for ounce, the Danforth style anchors are the best in terms of holding. I always carry one. And I’ve been continually amazed at how well they hold in sand or mud if deployed properly with sufficient scope.

But I do NOT carry one on my bow. They don’t always reset when the wind changes. They often become entangled when the current opposes the wind and your vessel circles while tide-bound. Occasionally, a rock or piece of coral jams the flukes up, and they skate across the bottom like it was ice.

Bottom line: almost no cruising boat has a Danforth in its bow roller.

The majority of offshore cruising vessels and circumnavigating sailboats used to have CQR anchors. It was a big advancement. Authorities like Eric Hiscock used and advocated them in the 1950s. They still hold well when properly set in sand. But I believe that new designs are better for a number of reasons.

The Bruce is extremely popular. There are no moving parts. It is strong. However, it doesn’t penetrate grass well. It takes a while to dig in. Soupy conditions aren’t its forte.

The Delta is a very good anchor—with all the advantages of the Bruce and the CQR. It penetrates grass much better. This is the preferred choice in the Med. Super strong!

But I carry a Rocna (Editor’s Note: He is referring to the Rocna 25KG which is 55 lbs) with 240 feet of 10mm chain on the bow of my 43-foot, 30,000 pound ketch Ganesh.

  • It holds extremely well.
  • It works in a wide variety of bottom types.
  • It stows in most bow rollers well.
  • It sets the fastest of any anchor I have ever had—so quickly it can surprise you (and your gear can be dangerously shock-loaded if your snubber is not in place).

No anchor should be short-scoped. However, if you have to ride to a short scope, a Rocna is a good choice.

anchorchaininbucket
Cap’n Fatty has his chain regalvanized every two years, when possible.

The better the anchor holds—the more it needs to be firmly attached to the vessel.

Most cruising boats use a chain rode. This offers several advantages; chafe is not an issue. The weight, especially in deep water, acts to effectively increase your apparent scope in moderate weather. (Note: this is NOT true in strong conditions.)

Perhaps most importantly, chain can be easily and conveniently handled by most modern deck windlasses—allowing a cruising sailboat to deploy its best gear in a very easy, safe, effective manner. This means you have more protection, more often.

Nylon rope can be used, as well. It is light in weight and offers superior stretch. Alas, it can chafe through on coral or any underwater obstruction at any time—thus, making chain far preferable. (To save weight on a small vessel, I once sailed around the world without chain—Lord, what a hassle!)

Two more notes, seldom considered:

  1. Galvanized steel is the preferred choice for an anchor and its chain. Steel is extremely predictable, and never fails without warning. If your chain is not rusty, it will hold as advertised—not so, stainless steel.
  2. Do NOT use ss shackles between a galvy chain and a galvy anchor. Beware of ss anchor swivels, too. Never use an ‘off brand’ or no brand one—and even the best can fail catastrophically without warning.

I do NOT use a ss swivel.

So… The best, most common way to anchor a cruising sailboat in a wide variety of conditions is to use a CQR, Bruce, Delta, or Rocna anchor on galvy chain.

To lessen the shock of the non-stretching chain, I use a 20-foot nylon snubber with a chain claw—which totally insulates the anchor from shock loading and the boat from any bottom noise.

Which leads us to the subject of scope.

What is anchor scope? Why? How much do you need?

Okay, scope is the amount of rode (chain or nylon or combo) you deploy between boat and anchor. How to determine how much scope?

  1. Take the depth of the water
  2. add the height of the bow roller above water—and
  3. times it by five to get the correct scope in light to moderate winds.

Let’s say that you anchor in 15 feet of water, and your bow roller height is five feet. You need 100 feet of rode to anchor. No less.

Nearly all anchor dragging is because of too little scope. 5 to 1 is minimum. 7 or 8 to 1 is recommended in a blow. I deploy 10 to 1 during hurricanes (dozens of which I’ve ridden out successfully, two of which I haven’t).

Why not always put out all your chain? You could. I often do in deserted anchorages. But when other boats are present, it is best to share the resource and limit your scope—or you will limit your friends within the anchorage.

Another factor is bottom type

  • sand and mud are good.
  • Clay is great.
  • Rocks are erratic, and some anchors (Danforth types, for example) are not suited for rocks; this is where Yachtsman and various other small fluke ‘pick’ anchors shine.

It used to be, when I grew up aboard the schooner Elizabeth in the 1950s, that every boat had an armed sounding lead.

Most people are confused by the ‘armed’ part. Simple, each lead weight used for sounding was hollow at the bottom. You’d ‘arm’ it by squishing in a little beeswax—and tossing it overboard to the bottom. The wax would bring up the bottom-sample embedded in it, hopefully sand or mud.

Today I use an inexpensive fish finder. It indicates the hardness of the bottom (after you get used to reading its graphic display) and shows if there are any coral heads or other obstructions on the bottom.

Tips!

  • One should, of course, avoid anchoring on a lee shore—where the wind is pushing you onto the beach and the seas can build without hampering.
  • It is best to anchor in an enclosed harbour with the wind blowing off the beach. It will be flat calm in terms of seas (waves). If the harbour is truly snug and landlocked, it won’t matter if the wind veers or clocks.
  • Another factor is reaction time. Let’s say you go into a landlocked harbour to sit out an easterly blow. You should anchor on the eastern side of the harbour, so you have minimal waves and maximum reaction should you begin to drag.
  • Thus, you should never anchor too close directly behind someone—it is poor seamanship and bad manners.
  • The time honored rule in relationship to other vessels is dead simple; the first vessel to anchor has rights. If you anchor anywhere around it, it is up to YOU to not hit IT.

Ideally, all vessels anchored in a harbour should have 5 to 1 scope. This is seldom the case. Usually, our precious natural resources are shared; some boats are at a dock, others on moorings, some stern to, and the rest swing to their hooks.

You can not come in and anchor unless you can do so safely—without damaging the other vessels REGARDLESS of what happens in terms of wind, tide, and current.

You also need to pay attention to how the other boats are maintaining their positions. Boats on mooring generally swing in a lot tighter circle than boats on anchors.

In the Bahamas, two anchors deployed off the boat are almost mandatory. In Hiva Oa in the Pacific, two anchors are required—one off the stern and one off the bow. In Turkey, a stern line is taken ashore in most places after the bow anchor is deployed.

The point is: when in Rome, do as the Romans do. If everyone has an anchor ball deployed (as they do in the Med), deploy yours. Forget it in the Great Lakes; they wouldn’t even know what a black ball is. (It means ‘anchor down’ and is mandatory under international law most places.)

If you don’t have a black ball up, someone can hit you and claim you were maneuvering—or that they didn’t know you were anchored, etc.

Here’s how to deploy for precise anchor placement

Let’s say you want to anchor in twenty feet of water in a crowded harbor.

  1. Slowly cruise around until you find your preferred spot. Place your vessel exactly where you want it to be, the place at which you want it to end up anchored.
  2. Check to see if there’s a current, AND if other nearby vessels are also anchored with chain rodes. If the answers are no and yes, proceed directly upwind while letting out 15 feet of chain.
  3. When you are 120 feet upwind, stop, and put your engine in reverse. The moment you start to gather stern way (within 10 feet) drop your anchor on the bottom. Slowly pay out rode, occasionally ‘almost’ snubbing off.
  4. Now deploy your nylon snubber around 90 feet or so. If you backed up 10 feet before dropping and it took ten feet for your anchor to set–and you desire 5 to 1 scope, you should be exactly where you were (and want to be) when 100 feet of rode is out.
  5. Slowly increase throttle astern until your anchor chain is taut, then run up to half RPM. Carefully check your shore bears to confirm you are holding. Maintain this position for one full minute, then throttle down. You are done.
    Your vessel will move forward a bit, from the weight of the chain. You should stay there if the wind remains constant, and change safely in relationship to the other vessels if it does not. If the holding ground is good and your gear ample, you should be fine up to 50 knots in smooth water.

My policy on vessel proximity is simple

I attempt to anchor as prudently as far away from another vessel as possible. If for any reason the other fellow thinks I’m too close—I am! I either don’t anchor or move immediately.

If I inform a vessel’s skipper that he’s anchoring too close and, in the middle of the night, there’s contact—I expect him to pay all my damages and certainly will not be liable for his.

I don’t like involving the law, but once a guy did a lot of damage to my vessel after being told repeatedly that he was too close and repeatedly politely asked to leave—and when the judge heard this, the trial was effectively over.

Anchoring a Boat in a hurricane

Anchoring in a hurricane incorporates all of the above—with an emphasis on chafe.

I pre-rig three snubbers to my chain—and swath my nylon with canvas or hose. Sometimes I put a short piece of Dacron®  where my gear comes aboard—Dacron® doesn’t melt as easily as nylon from the intense friction.

I also slather it with grease if the line is showing signs of rapid wear—and have plywood and crowbars standing by to deal with chains or rodes sawing through their hawse holes and cutting a straight line down through the hull and deck! (Faster Horses had exactly this happen to them in 1989 during Hurricane Hugo.)

The bottom line on staying connected to the bottom—it is usually possible in moderate conditions with the proper gear properly deployed.

If you know how to anchor your vessel, you have my respect. If you do not—whether you are on an 8’ Opti or a 124’ Oyster—you do not.

Publisher’s note: Fatty and Carolyn are currently in the Western Pacific, practicing what they preach.

http://www.allatsea.net/anchoring-a-boat-the-ultimate-guide/

Russian jets make provocative passes over Navy ship

Posted By on April 14, 2016

russiabalticdonaldcook

This isn’t the first close call incident according to the news coming from the Pentagon, but a very close and dangerous pass over the USS Donald Cook in the Baltic. They halted exercises with a Polish helicopter landing on the flight deck and shared the video below.

 

Thankfully cooler head prevailed but at some point someone is going to see Russian SU-24 supersonic attack aircraft heading for “your ship” as a threat to be eliminated … can you blame them?

Happy THIRD anniversary to Katelyn and Drew

Posted By on April 13, 2016

happy3rdanniversary

It is hard to believe that 3 years have come and gone already, but time does not stand still. Katelyn and Drew will be celebrating their wedding anniversary over the weekend rather than today; they have a special getaway planned!  I’m so glad they found each other (Pumpy Umpy is glad too).
Smile

Keeping a Raspberry Pi 3 cool for 5 dollars

Posted By on April 13, 2016

It looks like a small heatsink might be a good idea in order to preserve the stability of my Raspberry Pi3 as well as a cooler processor making the little American Pi microserver last a bit longer. Temperatures are generally 20 degrees higher than the Pi2 and have reached 90 degrees C a couple times during application installation.

That small passive heatsink is able to drop the SoC temperature almost in half. If you are interested in this $5 heatsink for the Raspberry Pi, you can find it at Amazon.com.

Source: Here Is A $5 Fix To Cool Your Raspberry Pi 3

Mt Washington New Hampshire -231 mph record wind in 1934

Posted By on April 12, 2016

Did you know that "on this day" in 1934 in aWeatherStationMtWashington small weather station (chained to the ground) atop of Mt. Washington in New Hampshire measured record setting winds speeds of 231 mph? Wow!

That record held until Cyclone Olivia was recorded at 253 mph wind gusts on Barrow Island in Australia in 1996. I’m not sure how one survives in that kind of wind … but even more shockingly is  the wind speeds "exceed 100 mph on one of every three days" during  winter on Mt. Washington; it is known as "Home of the World’s Worst Weather."

MtWashingtonWindsm

The mountain sits at the convergence of three storm tracks from the Atlantic Ocean to the south, the southwest and the northwest. Westerly winds accelerate as they race up the mountainside.  And low pressure systems develop along the warmer ocean in winter and collide with the colder Northeast air, causing storms to develop.

Mt._Washington_chained_building

Because of its severe weather, Mt. Washington is known as ‘the most dangerous small mountain in the world.’ On that April day in 1934, it was indeed dangerous for the five men hunkered down in the observatory.

The 2-year-old observatory was staffed by Salvatore Pagliuca, Alex McKenzie and Wendell Stephenson. They had two guests, Arthur Griffin and George Leslie. The small building was chained to the ground.

When the men went to bed on the night of April 11, pressure was falling and winds were increasing rapidly to 136 mph. By the next morning it was obvious they were in the middle of a super-hurricane. Stephenson checked the instrument that recorded the wind speed and saw it was wrong. That meant the anemometer was iced over.

Stephenson suited up, grabbed a club and opened the door. The wind knocked him down. With the wind at his back, he climbed the ladder, clubbed the anemometer dozens of times and cleared the ice — an incredibly difficult and dangerous task. Then he went back into the station and checked the recorder. It showed a windspeed of 150 mph.

The men recorded frequent values of 220 mph, with occasional gusts of 229 mph. Then, at 1:21 pm on April 12, 1934, the extreme value of 231 mph out of the southeast was recorded.

To experience a similar wind, wrote one observer, you’d have to poke your head out of a 747 on takeoff.

The record held until 2010, when a review of climate data turned up a 253 mph gust on Barrow Island in Australia during Cyclone Olivia in 1996.

Link from New England Historical Society

Who knows what emoji you are really sending and receiving?

Posted By on April 12, 2016

Ever notice that the emoji you send from one device to another isn’t always translated the same? Well that because each platform has their own unique way of translating that "grinning or grimacing face" that we once-upon-a-time type as punctuation marks and called emoticons.

sameemojis

A study by the GroupLens Research team at the University of Minnesota examines the variations between some popular emoji presentations and how they are perceived. The most widely misinterpreted is the “grinning face with smiling eyes” emoji, which—depending on the platform—can range from the rosy-cheeked cherubic face of glee to the anguished clenched-teeth look of constipation.

Gizmodo article

Raspberry Pi security video and nearing the end for the Rav4

Posted By on April 12, 2016

We found out a couple things Monday … first, the Raspberry Pi garage camera seems to be working just fine after tweaking a few thing while experimenting in the house, albeit the video is a bit delayed (15 seconds maybe ???). So far so good with video … next to get some motion detection so as not to broadcast continually.

RasberryPiCam160411

Second, Brenda’s 1998 Toyota Rav4 has seen better days. We’ve pretty much stretch the life out of this little petite 4×4 and it has given us good service for 18 years and 265,000 miles. Since our “fleet” (as my son-in-law calls it) has grown to too many vehicles, we decided it was time to thin the herd. My friend Tim has a daughter nearly ready to drive and both of us thought it would make a perfect first car. He came over and took it to a trusted mechanic and unfortunately “car cancer” known as “rust” has eaten away in a few critical areas of the frame. The body is fine, but the undercarriage must not have received the same corrosion prevention? Unfortunately the car is just not safe for a young driver (or probably old?) and it would need some reinforcement … something that is realistically cost prohibitive. So … next step is to sell it for parts or as a salvage vehicle. Are you trying to keep an older Rav4 running?

Rav4 rust

Who is reading what — the top blog posts from the past decade

Posted By on April 11, 2016

While cleaning up the MyDesultoryBlog.com WordPress install in preparation for an eventually PHP 7.0 update, I decided it was time to see just what posts were getting the most eyeballs. TopPost2015For years, the top post was the Great White Shark following a kayak … and rightly so. After a few years and a popular Accelerated Medical School Program post, top spot fell to the Rogue wave/Cruise ship photo shortly after we experienced 94KT wind gusts on a Mediterranean cruise vacation. A surprise Boat shoe inserts/insoles post and the following Topsiders series eventually surpassed the previous posts. Finally they gave way to Jacob Tolliver pounds the piano in an Ohio hardware store and finally a surprise how to post on the Honda Odyssey power sliding doorwho knew?  

Unfortunately the only one in the top 10 from last year (2015) was  an archived Paul Harvey audio clip from 1965.

  Paul Harvey This was his warning in 1965

Desultory - des-uhl-tawr-ee, -tohr-ee

  1. lacking in consistency, constancy, or visible order, disconnected; fitful: desultory conversation.
  2. digressing from or unconnected with the main subject; random: a desultory remark.
My Desultory Blog